Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
81. [Ship Balance] - Highsec Ganking and Freighters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sigras wrote: I think we're talking about different things here. I never said that there are at ton of freighter kills including just pyerite; I said that it would be profitable to gank those freighters (if only slightly) And I'm saying that...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.05 17:03:00
|
82. Security tokens: What happened to them? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Token security would probably not be nearly as difficult to implement. Token's not a bad guy, why are you siccing security on him? Is it because he's black? I'm happy with a normal login. Secure enough for my ban...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.05 09:41:00
|
83. [Ship Balance] - Highsec Ganking and Freighters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
sci0gon wrote: i disagree with that statement on the fact that the high sec gankers from the code alliance have killed several freighters varying from 0.5 to 0.9 systems with nothing more then 10-25 destroyer class ships (catalysts / thrashers)...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.05 09:29:00
|
84. [Ship Balance] - Highsec Ganking and Freighters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sigras wrote: yeah because people dont have tens of millions of pyerite lying around that they need to ship by itself. Im just saying that even random crap collected from missions wont fill a freighter without exceeding the "safety limit" and ...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.05 01:32:00
|
85. To pay Concord Tax for Blue Standings with eachother - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Danika Princip wrote: Why is it considered a bad thing to have friends anyway? Friends are overpowered. Nerf Friends.
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.04 17:01:00
|
86. [Ship Balance] - Highsec Ganking and Freighters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Meyr wrote: If a freighter can be taken with ISBoxer, as evidenced by the kills posted, that should invalidate the earlier posts telling the haulers "get friends, get help!" You can also get alts. They did, and they need more than you do. T...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.04 05:07:00
|
87. Another idea to improve FW - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Solution: [Phobos, FW Hunting Phobos] Damage Control II Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Nanofiber Internal Structure II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II 10MN A...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.04 01:41:00
|
88. [Ship Balance] - Highsec Ganking and Freighters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sigras wrote: IMHO the "safety number" is a bit low. Assuming it takes 80 million isk per talos, and 6 talos' to take down a freighter, its profitable to gank a freighter hauling nothing but pyerite at current prices. That seems a bit ridicul...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.04 01:21:00
|
89. High sec pirates and mission runners, be aware of this tactic. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Eterne wrote: Moving this from General Discussion to Crime & Punishment. Whinging is a crime.
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.04 00:04:00
|
90. High sec pirates and mission runners, be aware of this tactic. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Why? Incursions are fine. They're more than fine, actually, they're ridiculously easy streams of income at little risk. But what if a Logi DCs?!?!?!?!?!!?!
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.03 23:20:00
|
91. How to sell copies? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Paul Otichoda wrote: Ok its the medium Ewar drone. I suppose that I've wasted my time, haven't I FYI, there's no T2 version of that, so, uh, don't worry about your ability to invent from it...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.03 19:26:00
|
92. [Ship Balance] - Highsec Ganking and Freighters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Seranova Farreach wrote: the isk spent to gank a frieghter is extreamly minimal compaired to losses.. like 5 of 6 tier3 BCs still come out on profit ganking just a charon hull with no cargo Where's the profit in a couple million ISK worth of...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.03 18:58:00
|
93. [Ship Balance] - Highsec Ganking and Freighters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Every 'meaningful defence' boils down to 'don't be there'. Once you are actually there, there is nothing you can do to defend, since you will get concorded for firing first. You can attempt to take retribution on the pods &...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.03 10:20:00
|
94. [Ship Balance] - Highsec Ganking and Freighters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
john scherer wrote: It is just me or has the advent of the tier-3 BC made highsec suicide ganking of freighters way too inexpensive and easy? So much so that it has become an EvE career path. The patch that introduced t3 BCs made suicide ga...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.03 08:47:00
|
95. Should we buff named guns? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Alavaria Fera wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: Did they remove actual named guns (meta <= 4) or are you specifically referring to faction and officer guns? IMO, meta >= T2 should be able t...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.03 05:38:00
|
96. High sec pirates and mission runners, be aware of this tactic. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nerf Burger wrote: No, it wouldn't because pirates could still steal mission loot. Next fail argument. Try again. Why should pirates be allowed to steal/blow up your required mission items in high sec with zero risk and zero cost to themselv...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.02 19:11:00
|
97. Collisions and the Conservation of Momentum equations (Physics) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nag'o wrote: A 18-¦ spin of a Titan that was just touched by a battleship would still look bad. In real physics, any force, no matter how small, acting to spin something in a vacuum will result in the object spinning forever, absent the acti...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.02 18:40:00
|
98. Collisions and the Conservation of Momentum equations (Physics) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Andy Landen wrote: I would allow that option, yes. It won't protect them from HIC points and neuts, though I disagree with the whole no ewar on supers mechanic. So now, to make things "more realistic," you're proposing that the largest ships...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.02 18:30:00
|
99. High sec pirates and mission runners, be aware of this tactic. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nerf Burger wrote: why don't you try explaining why it should stay instead of making baseless claims. Because "fixing" the "problem" would necessarily involve Malcanis wrote: treating mission runners as some kind of special chosen-kind wh...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.02 18:07:00
|
100. ungrounded account ban - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hasikan Miallok wrote: Yeah another example was the controversial decision that remote repairing drones can be a bannable offence. It was never made clear exactly what circumstances are where remote drone repping becomes a bannable offence. ...
- by Pipa Porto - at 2014.01.02 04:31:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |